Showing posts with label Piggyback Imaging. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Piggyback Imaging. Show all posts

Friday, January 10, 2020

#273 - Thursday, January 9, 2020 - An ""Astro-Modified DSLR""

A problem with DSLR cameras is that they have a spectrum filter on them to make the images look very close in color to how the human eye perceives it.  While great for daytime imaging, it inhibits the camera's performance for astrophotography, particularly because like the human eye, the spectrum filter passes very little red light.  Of course, if you've seen all of the nebula images I've taken, there is quite a lot of red-glowing gas out there in the universe.  This makes sense, considering that hydrogen is by far the most abundant element, and that red glow is from hydrogen!

There are services out there that will remove the spectrum filter from your DSLR for a couple hundred bucks, and Canon, Nikon, and Sony (and probably some others) sell astro versions of at least one of their cameras (although they are pricey!).  The thing is, after spending all that money, you still don't have a cooled camera.  So while it may be more sensitive to red, it's still going to be just as noisy.

Instead of spending $2,500 for the Canon EOS Ra, or $3,800 for the Nikon 810a, you can spend $1,000 for a cooled astrophotography-specific camera, like the ZWO ASI294MC Pro.  No spectrum filter (or UV/IR filter for that matter -- useful for imaging the planets in UV and IR), and it's cooled.  So an experiment I've been wanting to try for a while is using a color astro camera with a camera lens to do some widefield stuff.  (I also want to capture hydrogen alpha data with a monochrome camera, but that experiment will happen later).  I finally had the chance to assemble that setup this past weekend, after I bought a T-thread-to-Nikon bayonet adapter.  I couldn't use it right away last weekend because I didn't quite have the spacing correct -- I needed a little bit less separation between the lens and the camera in order to bring it to focus at infinity.  The solution was to swap out the female-threaded connector on the filter wheel with a male-threaded one so that I could attach my ZWO camera directly to the wheel without the male-to-female adapter ring that adds a couple of millimeters.  (The Starlight Xpress filter wheel has removable connectors so that you can attach the size/thread that you need).

From left to right: Nikon 70-300mm zoom lens, M42-Nikon bayonet adapter, Starlight Xpress filter wheel, ZWO ASI294MC Pro attached without the male-to-female M42 ring.  (M42 and T-thread are talking about the same thing).
The silver clamp is one that ZWO sells for their cameras.

I connected the camera to my tablet once again and pointed it out the window at a power pole across the street.  I focused the lens, and I was able to bring it into focus!!


The next step was to actually get it attached to my mount.  The clamp from ZWO has a tripod-sized connection, not a Vixen-sized one, so I needed a way to bolt it to a Vixen dovetail.  I tried just bolting it to a spare one I had, but the side with the grooves in it so that the bolt head would not interfere with actually attaching it to the mount was on the wrong side for the polarity to be right to attach the dovetail rail to the mount.  (Sorry, hard to explain without pictures...which I forgot to take).  So instead, I grabbed this short wooden dovetail I had from another scope, which has a few 1/4-inch holes in it, and attached it to that.  Got it all connected!  I attached it to my Celestron AVX mount.

 

It was getting darker as I finished putting things together, so it was time to grab the laptops and get rolling.  In addition to this novel rig, I also ran my Takahashi FSQ-106N refractor with my ZWO ASI1600MM Pro and a hydrogen-alpha filter atop my Paramount MyT.  Over on the AVX with the camera lens, I slewed to Aldeberan to focus (I left the mount aligned from when I had another telescope on it), and I added a calibration point after centering it.  To focus, I grabbed a tiny Bahtinov mask perfect for camera lenses that I had, but even with 2-second exspoures, a high gain, and a super stretch on the histogram, I couldn't quite see all three diffraction spikes with the lens at 70mm.  So I got it somewhat focused with that, and then getting the star as small as possible.  There was a little ring around the star because my lens is pretty achromatic, but it did, indeed, come to focus!  Very exciting.

The next challenge was trying to get the plate solver to work so that I could get targets accurately centered.  I messed around with the settings in PlateSolve2, which is the plate solve program by PlaneWave that I use within SequenceGenerator Pro, but couldn't get it to successfully plate solve -- I think the images were just too big of a field, at 15x10 degrees.  I also didn't see a way for it to use a subframe or a ROI (region of interest).  After some Googling, I ended up just using Astrometry.net's online blind plate  solver, which is much slower, but it worked!

The first target I queued up in SGP is one I've been wanting to do with a "spectrum-modified" camera for a while, which is an Orion constellation widefield, including Barnard's Loop.  It wouldn't be high enough until 8 PM though, so I added a widefield of the Taurus region, to get M45 (Pleaides Cluster) on one side of the frame, and the California Nebula on the other. 

After a couple of subframes came down looking at Taurus, I took a look at them and remembered that this lens has quite a lot of curvature -- I can really only use about the inner half to 2/3rds of it.  The framing at 70mm put M45 and the California Nebula both in the nasty part of either side of the lens, so I changed the target location to center M45 instead.  When it was slewing there, it took a weirdly long time (I was doing this from indoors), so I thought maybe it was meridian-flipping.  But it shouldn't have been time for that yet.  The plate solve solution was also waaaay far off in right ascension, and it wasn't getting better as SGP re-centered my mount.  So I went outside to see what was up, and yes, it did flip, but it was hitting my software slew limit for that side of the pier.  (I have it set to not go beyond 90 degrees, aka straight up, since my AVX has a loose dec axis, and the axis can slip out from the gears, causing problems).  For some reason, my AVX keeps resetting the meridian setting to "favor west," so I disabled the meridian setting (again) and went back inside.  When I re-started the sequence, it went back over to looking at the eastern sky -- perfect.  While it started imaging, I went to work figuring out what target to have it do after the Orion constellation. 

Single 5-minute subframe on the Pleiades Cluster with my 70mm lens and ZWO ASI294MC Pro (with a light pollution filter)

Back over on the Takahashi, the sequence hadn't actually started yet because the cooler on the camera hadn't reached the set temperature yet.  But it had been running for a while...it was only at 0.5C, and only 12% power!  Why?  And it wasn't increasing the power.  Ah crap.  Did I mess something up when I opened it up to clean the sensor?  I connected it to SharpCap and turned on the cooler there, and it seemed to function normally.  Phew!  So I disconnected and reconnected everything in SGP and restarted the program, and then it worked normally after that.  Weird.

Meanwhile, my first Orion constellation image came down -- I could see M42 quite well, the Flame and Horsehead Nebulae a bit, but no Barnard Nebula.  It was probably buried in the light pollution, I figured -- it's also a full Moon tonight.  So I changed the exposure time from 3 minutes to flipping back and forth between 1 minute and 5 minutes.

Single 3-minute frame on the Orion's Belt area, 70mm camera lens, ZWO ASI294MC Pro (with a light pollution filter)  

It was 8 PM then, time to go make some dinner!  Before doing that, I added a few more targets I came up with to the camera lens sequence: the Seagull Nebula (probably won't come out well, but why not try), the Beehive Cluster (I don't typically do open clusters, but I needed something), and the Coma Berenices region centered on the Needle Galaxy.

In the morning, I went to check on things; the Paramount setup aborted due to a failed meridian flip at some point, and didn't run my last target for the night, galaxy M106.  I also only get one frame on the Medusa Nebula.  I went through the log, but couldn't quite figure out what exactly made it abort.  In addition, I forgot to tick the "run" box for the 5-minute-long frames, so they didn't run.  On the other hand, the sequence for the camera lens over on the AVX ran all night and completed successfully.

We shall see how this experiment turns out!




Sunday, July 21, 2019

#194 - Saturday, July 6, 2019 - In the Atacama Desert

After a few more days in La Serena following the solar eclipse, we started a three-day road trip up the coast and then inland to Calama, and then on to San Pedro de Atacama.  We stayed overnight in ChaƱaral and Antofagasta on the way up.  The desert landscape was like from another world!  There were many places where there was absolutely nothing but rock and sand.  And the occasional guanaco.  We got out at a guanaco observing spot near the Paranal Observatory, and sure enough, we saw one!  And then it made a funny noise and ran off.  Besides the crunching of our feet on the gravel, it was absolutely, perfectly silent.  We couldn't even hear the wind in this little valley we were in.  I had never heard such wide-open silence before; it was totally eerie and incredible.  A Girl Scout badge I led with a middle school group when I was in college talked about different kinds of pollution, including sound pollution, and it talked about the quietest square inch of space on Earth.  When a car wasn't passing by, this had to be it!


We were basically on Mars.  But with more oxygen.

What made it especially crazy was the fact that we were not at all far from the ocean.  In some places, we could see barren desert one one side of the road and crashing waves on the other!

The highway we were on took us past the Paranal site of the European Southern Observatory, and while we hadn't been able to get a tour there when we tried, we hoped there might be a cancellation, and at least we could see them from a distance if not.  We were out of luck, but the gate guard let us use the restroom there and re-fill out waterbottles, which was very nice.  We took plenty of pictures from the parking lot.  Yay for my long lens!

Paranal Observatory, from a distance

Posing with the sign

The altitude at the parking lot was around 7800 feet!  

In Antofagasta, our hotel was right on the beach, so we enjoyed watching the waves ceaselessly roll in, ever-changing, but ever the same.  It was hypnotizing.  

The Pacific Ocean -- the color of the water was beautiful!

On the third day of the road trip, Thursday, we drove for three hours from the coast up to the 7400 feet of the town of Calama.  We stopped at a large grocery store there called Jumbo (like Chilean Walmart, but a little nicer), since it was easier to get supplies there than in San Pedro de Atacama.  However, due to the sudden change in altitude, we were all lethargic, sick, and crabby.  So we tried our best to hold ourselves together while we shopped quickly, and then drove the next hour to San Pedro de Atacama, and the Atacama Lodge.

The Atacama Lodge is an amateur astronomer's dream land, owned by French ex-pat Alain Maury, himself an astronomer who grew tired of the light pollution and the politics of France and sought better skies.  It grew to be part robotic scope operation, part astro-tourism, a few kilometers south of the touristy village of San Pedro de Atacama in northern Chile, lying in the shadow of the volcanic Andes Mountains.  He hand-built a sunflower field of telescopes, with which he hosts nightly tours in three languages to showcase the wonders of the Southern skies.  


Less of a hotel and more of a nice set of adobe cabins, the accommodations were charming and fun.


My room

John & Beth's room

Gorgeous mosaic tile in the bathroom

Kitchen & dining area, complete with cookware and dishes.  And, very importantly -- a coffee maker!

Actual thatch roof!

Bonus, it had a heater, which none of our previous hotels had, which was a godsend.  The forecast showed that it would dip into the 30s every night!

Once Alain himself finally returned from a grocery run to Calama, he quickly got me set up on the Sky-Watcher AZEQ6 with a Takahashi FSQ-85ED before he had to zip off for that night's astro-tours.  The mount was located in a giant motor-driven rolloff shed that contained several robotic scopes owned by people from around the world, including one owned by none other than Guylain Rochon, the man behind the BackyardNikon and BackyardEOS camera-control software that I use.  Since the shed automatically opened and closed at sundown and sunup, I'd be able to leave everything connected, and it would be kept safe from the heat and the dust during the day.


Alain ran back to his house and got the key for the little half-door, but couldn't get it to unlock.  After much effort, including attempting to remove the lock from the door (he just jumped over the half-wall to get to the inside), we finally just set up a chair on the inside and outside to use to help climb over the wall!  I got pretty good at it by the end of the night in the dark.

The Takahashi didn't have a guide scope attached, but Alain said it wouldn't need it, and I hoped he was right.  I had prepped the software on my computer for plugging the hand controller in via serial-to-USB cable and running it using the SynScan driver and app, but he didn't have that cable -- instead, the AZEQ6 had a direct USB cable, like the Celestron CGX-L mount, which I had no idea it had.  This required EQMOD to run.  Before it got properly dark, I went back to the wifi in the lodge to install EQMOD, but I couldn't get the driver to show up in ASCOM when I tried to connect to it in Cartes du Ciel.  So instead, since I wasn't guiding, I just used the hand controller and didn't bother with trying to control it from my computer.  I just hoped the gotos would be good enough to not need a finderscope, which it also didn't have.  I got my ZWO ASI1600MM Pro and Starlight Xpress 2-inch filter wheel attached without issue.  Alain had a Takahashi-to-T-thread adapter handy (although I had brought mine just in case). 

My ZWO ASI1600MM Pro camera and Starlight Xpress filter wheel attached to Alain Maury's Takahashi FSQ-85ED on a Sky-Watcher AZEQ6 mount.

Sunset was gorgeous, especially the way the Andes changed colors.  I have a timelapse video that I'll put together (eventually), which I'm really excited about.


Once it got darker, I needed to get the camera focused.  I had it slew to a bright star, but since I wasn't sure how well polar aligned it was at the moment, that star did not end up in the field of view of the camera.  I cranked up the screen stretch on the histogram in SharpCap, but still couldn't even see any giant blobs.  So instead, I slewed it myself over toward some patch of the Milky Way, where I knew there would be stars in the field no matter where I pointed.  After over-stretching the histogram, I saw some giant blobs, and was able to get the scope roughly focused for alignment.  I would like to take a moment to point out something amazing -- this is a one-second exposure.  There were so many stars!  It was so dark that many more stars than usual could stand out.


Wowee!!
Next, I ran the polar alignment process in SharpCap, which it was capable of doing in the southern hemisphere the same way it does in the northern -- by way of plate solving.  


It was during this process than I ran into my next stumbling block -- Alain had showed me where the RA and dec clutch knobs were, but I couldn't remember where the RA one was.  So I tried various things for about 15 minutes before I finally figured it out!  But I finally got the darn thing polar aligned.  I also balanced it before polar aligning, although I wasn't able to balance it in dec because I ran out of dovetail to move it any more forward to compensate for my camera gear on the back.

Next was alignment, which I did with the hand controller in a very similar process to Celestron.  The stars landed in the FOV for every star, which was very exciting and helpful.  Finally, after focusing on a bright star with the Bahtinov mask I'd brought with me, it was time to line up my first target.  I chose something easy -- compact and relatively bright -- for my first target: Centaurus A.  It's a large, oddly-shaped galaxy, somewhere between 10-16 million lightyears away, also sometimes called the Hamburger Galaxy. Viewing it visually makes that moniker choice obvious -- it was a bright upper and lower hemisphere, split by a thick dark band of dust, making it look very much like an enormous hamburger in the sky.  You can see it from the southern United States -- from the 29 degrees north latitude of the Texas Star Party, it crests at 12 degrees off the horizon or so, just high enough to let it peak for an hour or two above the hills.  But here at 22 degrees south, it was quite high in the sky, with much less atmosphere between me and it.  Thanks to the dark skies, it was very easy to see with 1-second exposures in SharpCap, so I centered it by hand, switched over to SequenceGenerator Pro, keyed up the sequence I wanted, and let it run.  The plan I had developed several months ago for which targets I was going to image when called for starting with RGB that night before changing targets for the second half of the night -- with RGB, I'd have a complete dataset, in case something broke later in the week and I didn't get to finish.  Having a luminance channel is great, but not required.  

I took a few test frames first to see how long it would track for, and I got as far as 5 minutes with just the tracking, and my stars were still mostly round!  I set the exposure time to 3 minutes so I could get more frames, and because that was long enough for the ZWO in these dark skies with this brighter target.  

Single 180s red channel frame, screen-stretched & zoomed in

The RGB frames looked a little out of focus, so partway through the night, I slewed over to a nearby bright star and checked the focus with a Bahtinov mask.  I tweaked it slightly, but it was very close.  I cinched down the focus lock a little tighter, slewed back to Centaurus A, and carried on.

Single 180s blue channel frame

While the ZWO was running, I set up my Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer with my Nikon D5300 and 70-300mm lens attached again, which I found some space for in the shed as well. Polar aligning this one was going to be harder -- I had no SharpCap to help me.  (I am working on putting together a rig for one of my guidescopes that will attach to the second camera screw on the Star Adventurer, which I could use both for polar alignment and for auto-guiding.  Yes, the Star Adventurer has a ST-4 port!)  I used my cell phone to get it pointed due south and get the elevation close to correct, but I couldn't see the Octans trapezoid in the polar scope still.  So I pointed it to the eastern horizon and then to zenith to do some drift alignment, which helped a bit.  I pulled the zoom on the lens back to something around 135mm, focused it, and then turned it to the glorious Eta Carinae Nebula.  I was able to get about 90s exposure times with minimal streaking, so I set it there and let it run.

Later in the night, I had a brainwave -- the Takahashi clamshell ring had a 1/4-20 tripod screw on the top!  So I took one of my ball heads and attached it to the top, and grabbed my Nikon D3100 and my new 35mm f/1.8 Nikon lens and got everything attached.  I aimed it up somewhere in the middle of the Milky Way (yes, up, overhead!!), vaguely toward M8 & M20, and took a 30-second test exposure at f/2.  I went to check on my D5300, and caught a quick glimpse of the D3100 image once it had completed and flashed onto the screen, and I froze.  I stood there for a moment, dumbfounded.  Did I just see what I think I saw?  I fumbled for the Review button, and it re-appeared on the screen. Holy McShitNuggets (were the actual words that came out of my mouth), it was incredible!

30s exposure pointing up toward the Milky Way with my Nikon D3100 and 35mm f/1.8 lens at f/2.

So I just left the camera pointed there, set it to 60s exposures at ISO-800 and f/2, and let it roll!

After all this work, everything was clicking away happily, so I went back to the lodge to warm up, take a break, and have a snack.  After the break, John, Beth and I wandered over to a lone 24-inch Dob beside another one of the cabins, which was being used by part of a large French group that was also visiting the Atacama Lodge.  Between people, we snuck in to observe the massive globular cluster 47 Tucanae.  Located about 13,000 lightyears away, it has about 10,000 stars packed into a ball about 120 lightyears wide.  It's large and bright enough to be easily seen naked eye just off the edge of the Small Magellanic Cloud, and is second only to the Omega Centauri cluster.  47 Tuc may even have a black hole at its center.  It spans an area of the sky that is wider than the full Moon by almost twice!  It was so spectacular in the large telescope that it prompted me to shout "Holy mackerel!" (yes that is what I actually said), which garnered some chuckles from the French.  

We walked up to the main field to nab a scope up there to use for the night, but the French had commandeered all of them.  So I went back over to my cameras to check on things.  Eta Carinae had gotten too low to continue imaging, and it was time to change targets on the Takahashi as well, so I took the opportunity to swap lenses between the Nikon D3100 and D5300 so I could put the longer lens on the mount that was tracking more precisely.  However, this proved to be too heavy for the Sky-Watcher AZEQ6 mount, for which I already had the counterweight at the bottom of the rail, and gravity overcame the RA clutch knob and the scope slipped over!  I caught it, and it was not like it was totally loose or anything, but it did mean that I had to start over with alignment.  I tried to tighten down the RA axis some more, but I couldn't get it any tighter.  Alain had said he'd look for a second counterweight in the daylight.  So I took the camera off, re-aligned (gotos weren't as good this time, however), and pointed it to my second target for the night, a galaxy in the southern constellation Pavo called NGC 6744.  

I started with the L channel this time, but it looked out of focus.  So I checked focus again with a Bahtinov mask, but it was still perfect.  I thought that maybe it was evenly-sided periodic error or something.

180s luminance image of NGC 6744, zoomed in

I pressed on anyway, since I wasn't sure what else to do.  Then I went over to my Nikon D5300 and set it up on the Small Magellanic Cloud with the 35mm lens.

Around 3:30 AM, I was petering out.  The long day and high altitude were making me extra-tired.  So I shut down the power to everything like Alain had asked me to, and got into bed around 4:15 AM.

It was a great night!  I got my imaging rigs rolling, the sky was incredible, and the Milky Way was simply mind-blowing.  We couldn't quite see any color, but the transparency might not have been the clearest that night due to the earlier clouds.  There were also some clouds still down near the horizon.  But the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds that appeared later in the night were easy to spot, as well as a large number of deep sky objects with averted vision.  I couldn't wait for the rest of the week!  We had five full nights under these skies!

[ Update July 21, 2019 ] 

I processed this image last weekend, but now that I finally got this log entry written, here is the Eta Carinae Nebula!

Date: 6 July 2019
Location: Atacama Lodge, San Pedro de Atacama, Chile
Object: Eta Carinae Nebula
Attempt: 1
Camera: Nikon D5300
Telescope: Nikon 70-300mm lens @ 90mm, f/4.5
Accessories: N/A
Mount: Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer
Subframes: 54x90s (1h21m)
Gain/ISO: ISO-1600
Acquisition method: Intervalometer
Stacking program: PixInsight 1.8.6
Post-Processing program: PixInsight 1.8.6
Darks: 0
Biases: 0
Flats: 0
Temperature: 33-36F

The stars came out a little bloated, and it turns out I was closer to 90mm than the 135mm-ish I thought I set it to, but isn't it a gorgeous region??  

Featured here is the Eta Carinae Nebula, which is a massive stellar nursery located in the constellation Carina, or "keel of the ship."  It's about 8,500 lightyears from us, and is 460 lightyears across!  From our perspective here on Earth, it's four times larger and is brighter than the famous Orion Nebula!  Unfortunately, however, you can only see it from southern skies.

It has a multitude of interesting stellar objects contained within.  One such object is the star Eta Carinae itself, which is an extremely luminous hypergiant star, weighing in at 100-150 times the mass of our Sun, and outputting four million times more light.  Due to its large mass, it is likely to go supernova in the near future ("near" in astronomical terms, of course). 

Immediately surrounding the star Eta Carinae is the Homunculus Nebula (probably the coolest nebula name ever, meaning "Little Man" in Latin, which sounds much less cool), which is the result of a huge outburst from Eta Carinae seen on Earth in 1841, which for a short time made it one of the brightest stars in the sky.  It's a very oddly-shaped nebula, and there are some very cool pictures out there of it!  

Also pictured here are the Southern Pleiades to the left, and the tighter open cluster NGC 3532 (also called the Pincushion Cluster, Football Cluster, or Wishing Well Cluster) to the upper right, as well as several other clusters.  

Here's how I processed it in PixInsight:

- Since I don't have any 90s dark frames at those temperatures, I skipped right to SubframeSelector
- Image scale: 8.97 arcsec/px
- Gain: 0.115 e/ADU
- Highest scoring frame: DSC_0050 (88.648)
- Debayered
- Registered with StarAlignment, with DSC_0050 as reference
- Stacked with ImageIntegration, using Linear Fit Clipping for rejection
- Cropped with DynamicCrop
- Applied DynamicBackgroundExtraction
- Color corrected with PhotometricColorCalibration
- Tried Deconvolution, but didn't like how it made the stars look
- Denoised with MultiscaleLinearTransform
- Stretched with HistogramTransformation
- Applied HDRMultiscaleTransform, 7 iterations, with lum mask
- Touched up with CurvesTransformation and HistogramTransformation

I'll probably go back and re-process this one and try to get the stars to not dominate the image as much.  We just discussed this on The Astro Imaging Channel last week, so I'll have to go back and re-watch it.

[ More update July 21, 2019 ] 

After I posted some of the screenshots of the Centaurus A galaxy, I realized the data didn't look as bad as I thought.  So I spent the later part of the afternoon processing that data.

I realized when I was filling in my documentation text file that somehow the gain got set to only 10 for this dataset, for which I have no dark frames.  I tried processing with gain 0 frames, but the calibrated light frames came out pretty much nuked of light.  So I went ahead and processed without calibration frames, but they turned out not to be that necessary, since I had my sensor cooled to -30C.  I didn't take any luminance data, although in a future re-do of this dataset, I might crop and re-scale this color data and add it to the luminance data I took of Centaurus A at the Texas Star Party.  It may or may not help, since Centaurus A was much lower in the sky -- and thus in the thicker, nastier part of the atmosphere -- but it might be worth a shot.

Anyway, here it is!

Date: 6 July 2019
Location: Atacama Lodge, San Pedro de Atacama, Chile
Object: Centaurus A
Attempt: 2
Camera: ZWO ASI1600MM Pro
Telescope: Takahashi FSQ-85ED
Accessories: Starlight Xpress filter wheel, Astrononik LRGB Type 2c 2-inch filters
Mount: Sky-Watcher AZEQ6 (Alain Murray's)
Guide scope: N/A
Guide camera: N/A
Subframes: R: 28x180s
   G: 26x180s
   B: 10x180s
   Total: 64x180s (3h12m)
Gain/ISO: 10 (not sure how that happened)
Acquisition method: SequenceGenerator Pro
Stacking program: PixInsight 1.8.6
Post-Processing program: PixInsight 1.8.6
Darks: 0
Biases: 0
Flats: 0
Temperature: -30C (chip)

This might be only my 'official' second attempt, but I had tried to image it before but ran into other issues that led me to not keep that data.  So I'm happy to finally have an image of this cool galaxy!  It's not only cool to look at in its weirdness, but its weirdness has made it an interesting target of study.  Centaurus A is somewhere between 10-16 million lightyears away -- no one is quite sure.  It doesn't fit cleanly into any established galaxy category, and its odd shape is probably a result of a galaxy merger.  At the center of that galaxy is a 56-million-solar-mass black hole that is blasting out jets that move at half the speed of light and emit brightly in x-ray and radio.  They extend out to a million lightyears!  Very cool galaxy to look at.  It's also on the top-5 list of the brightest galaxies in the sky as seen from Earth, so it makes a good visual observing target.

[ Update August 8, 2019 ] 

Still plowing through Chile datasets -- here's the Magellanic Cloud!  It turned out to be just a hair out of focus, so the quality isn't that great, but here it is anyway.

Date: 6 July 2019
Location: Atacama Lodge, San Pedro de Atacama, Chile
Object: Small Magellanic Cloud
Attempt: 1
Camera: Nikon D5300
Telescope: Nikon 35mm f/1.8G @ f/2
Accessories: N/A
Mount: Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer
Guide scope: N/A
Guide camera: N/A
Subframes: 28x90s (42m)
Gain/ISO: ISO-1600
Acquisition method: Intervalometer
Stacking program: PixInsight 1.8.6
Post-Processing program: PixInsight 1.8.6
Darks: 0
Biases: 20 (28F)
Flats: 0
Temperature: 32-35F

I did try to apply some deconvolution to see what sharpening could be done on the SMC, and with a small number of iterations, it helped a tiny bit.  I did try MaskedStretch for stretching the image, but it blew out the small pink and blue halos around the stars, which I didn't like.  So I re-stretched it myself with HistogramTransformation instead.

Here's the whole process:
- No darks, calibrated lights with pre-made superbias using ImageCalibration
- SubframeSelector:
- Scale: 23.07 arcsec/px
- Gain: 0.115 e/ADU
- Highest-scoring frame: DSC_0162 (85.313)
- Debayered
- Registered with StarAlignment
- Stacked with ImageIntegration
- Combination: Average
- Normalization: Additive
- Pixel rejection: Linear Fit Clipping
- Cropped with DynamicCrop
- Applied DynamicBackgroundExtraction
- Denoised with MultiscaleLinearTransform
- Color corrected with PhotometricColorCalibration
- Applied Deconvolution using DynamicPSF, range_mask-star_mask, 10 iterations
- Tried MaskedStretch, but stars got pink and blue halos, so I stretched it myself
with HistogramTransformation
- Tweaked with CurvesTransformation
- Applied HDRMultiscaleTransform, 9 iterations

[ Update August 15, 2019 ] 

Still chugging through Chile data!  Being in the middle of a move makes finding time and energy to do this difficult!  But I finally had some chill time to work on it.  

I processed the stack of the Milky Way I took with the 35mm lens piggybacked on the Sky-Watcher AZEQ6 mount -- the "Holy McShitNuggets" dataset -- and the result was truly excellent!  There was also almost zero drift across the whole time of the stack, which was awesome and gave me nice round stars.

Date: 6 July 2019
Location: Atacama Lodge, San Pedro de Atacama, Chile
Object: Milky Way
Attempt: 9
Camera: Nikon D3100
Telescope: Nikon 35mm f/1.8G @ f/2
Accessories: N/A
Mount: Piggyback on Takahashi FSQ85ED, on Sky-Watcher AZEQ6
Guide scope: N/A
Guide camera: N/A
Subframes: 39x60s (39m total)
Gain/ISO: ISO-800
Acquisition method: Intervalometer
Stacking program: PixInsight 1.8.6
Post-Processing program: PixInsight 1.8.6
Darks: 0
Biases: 0
Flats: 0
Temperature: 31-35F

I just can't get enough of that Milky Way!!  There are several interesting things here.
- The super bright thing on the right is Jupiter
- In the lower right is the Rho Ophiuchi complex, which I've recently shared closer-up images of. The brighter yellow-orange star is Antares.
- The dark upside-down-U-shaped nebula to the left of Jupiter is the Pipe Bowl Nebula, a giant molecular cloud
- The two fuzzy red regions in the center of the image are two emission nebulae - NGC 6357 on top, and the Cat's Paw Nebula on bottom
- Up above NGC 6357 is open cluster M7, Ptolemy's Cluster
- In the lower left of the image, the other red nebula region is emission nebula IC 4628, surrounded by stars that are part of the Trumpler 24 open cluster

...and much more, of course!

This one was a pretty quick job.  Being one-shot color and not having issues or light pollution helped!
Here's the PixInsight processing:
- No darks or biases b/c I don't have a library for my D3100
- SubframeSelector:
- Scale: 25.9 arcsec/px
- Gain: 0.115 e/ADU (not actually measured, just borrowed from D5300)
- Debayered
- Registered with StarAlignment, using highest-scoring frame was reference
- Stacked with ImageIntegration
- Combination: Average
- Normalization: Additive
- Pixel rejection: Linear fit clipping
- Tried skipping DynamicBackgroundExtraction and did PhotometricColorCalibration instead, since there's pretty much no light pollution and most of the image is Milky Way anyway
- Denoised with MultiscaleLinearTransform, with luminance mask
- Stretched with MaskedStretch
- Tried with target background 0.15, interesting result, but not a huge fan
- Tried again with target background 0.10
- Tried again with 0.05, but too low, so did 0.08 - let me try some curves on that
- Adjusted with CurvesTransformation
- Applied the DarkStructureEnhance script

I wanted to have nice contrast between the bright and dark areas, and show just the insane number of stars in the bulge.  I also wanted the dark nebulae to stand out nicely.  But I didn't want it to look too hard or electronic either -- kind of softer, like how it might appear to our eyes if they were more sensitive.  As with many of my images, I'll probably mess around with it more in the future.  But I am quite pleased with this one!





Wednesday, May 16, 2018

#140 - Friday, May 11, 2018 - Sleep Deprivation - Texas Star Party Night #6

And so it was, on the sixth night, after days of burning the candle deeper and deeper into the night, chasing moonrise back until it was afraid to show its face until dawn, I, Molly Wakeling, hit the wall.

Friday night started out cloudy after not winning anything the first night of the Great Texas Giveaway, but then cleared up as promised after 2 AM.  After seeing some fantastic images of the Rho Ophiuchi region taken by another astrophotographer, I just had to try again, this time with 10-minute subframes.  But how to get 10-minute subframes when I can barely do two minutes on the Vixen Polarie?  The answer lay with the Borg.  Resistance was futile, so I rigged the scope for piggyback mode.

The reason I piggybacked it instead of attaching directly is that I needed to be able to guide in order to achieve 10-minute subframes, I was pretty sure.  So I pulled my 11-inch Vixen-style dovetail out of my support supply box, which I previously used to piggyback the Borg on my 11-inch to use as a guidescope until I got the Celestron guidescope on its Losmandy rail, and slide it into the dovetail clamps I leave on the Borg.  I just flip the Borg upside down and back for either mounting it on the C11 or attaching it to the AVX.  For the AVX, it has a small dovetail made, presumably by the previous owner, of wood.  Very clever, but not terribly stable, nor long enough - I will soon be replacing it with a plate or something.  With the SBIG detached, I also removed the waterbottles on the front, but kept the binoculars.  What a beautiful instrument of science.

With the 55-200mm lens set at 95mm and f/4.5, I loaded the previous night's alignment and slewed to the star Antares.  Using the DSLR's viewfinder (the good ol'-fashioned way), I adjusted the scope until Antares, the star Rho Ophiuchi itself, and the other stars in the vicinity were where I thought might work well to capture the region and its beautiful dark rivers.  After 1-minute and 5-minute test frames, I went all the way to 10 - and still got nice round stars!  (Very easy at that short of a focal length.)  All the while, I was dreaming of my bed.  The desire to be horizontal was powerful.  All of my astro-buddies had gone to bed, so I was out there alone.  Once the images were going, I set my alarm for 3 AM, when it was going to cross the meridian so I could do a meridian flip on the scope, and I got comfy in one of the reclining chairs.  Unbelievably, I did actually fall asleep for a bit (I am absolutely terrible at falling asleep any place besides a bed).  I woke up when my alarm went off, disoriented and feeling ill.  I staggered over to the telescope, did the meridian flip, attempted to visually put it back in the same spot (I didn't download the index files for AstroTortilla to be able to plate-solve images that wide, not to mention I didn't have the calculations on hand for what my actual FOV was to give to it), and took one or two more subframes, but they were way not in the right position, and I just didn't have the mental energy to continue.  So, with the sky still clear and dark at 4 AM, I dishearteningly shut down the computer, covered the scope, buttoned everything up in case of morning rain, and wandered to bed.  Pretty sure my path was quite zig-zaggy.  I didn't even brush my teeth, just threw on some PJs, put my retainer back in, and passed the heck out!  

Overall, I did much better than last year as far as late-night energy goes, but this was my absolute limit.  It helped that I got nearly 6 hours of quality sleep a night that week, sleeping in until 11 or 11:30, thanks especially to my quiet roommates and my quality sleeping mask.  

So, was my suffering worth it?  ...I'd say so!  My definite goal for next year is to get more subframes (although it's a week earlier, so the Milky Way will rise even later!), but this came out quite nicely for only four subframes!
Date: 11 May 2018
Location: Prude Ranch, TX - Texas Star Party
Object: Rho Ophiuchi region
Camera: Nikon D5300
Telescope: Nikon 55-200mm lens at 95mm, f/4.5
Accessories: N/A
Mount: Celestron AVX (piggyback on Borg)
Guide scope: Orion 50mm mini-guider
Guide camera: QHY5IIL-Mono (borrowed) 
Subframes: 4x600s (40m)
Gain/ISO: ISO-1600
Stacking program: DeepSkyStacker 4.1.0
Stacking method (lights): Auto-adaptive weighted average
Darks: 7
Biases: 20
Flats: 0
Temperature: 60-64F

It's a tough region to capture, but this was cool!


Wednesday, July 26, 2017

#99 - Tuesday, July 25, 2017 - I'm gonna need more coffee

It's a weeknight, Miqaela has "the bug," and of course I can never resist a clear night!  So I picked her up and we got out to the observatory at about 9:30 PM.  I decided to give piggyback imaging a try at the observatory - I figured the light pollution would be too much for short focal lengths, but I thought I'd try at least.  I mounted my D5300 atop the Vixen scope in the memorial dome, and attached a 70-300mm lens to it (also given to me by a club member last year).  At first, I couldn't see Deneb in the live view so I could focus (I had the focal length at ~200mm to try and capture the whole Veil Nebula), but the camera was up too high and was too far forward on the scope for me to use the viewfinder, so I ran inside and grabbed a step stool.  I saw where it was in the viewfinder, and then at last I was able to find it in the live view on my computer as a tiny dim spec.  I focused as best as I could, and then moved over the short distance to the Veil Nebula and took some 3-minute subframes.  They were pretty bright with light pollution, and I couldn't see the nebula at all.  So I scrapped that plan and plugged the D5300 into the Vixen and got guiding set up quickly.

Meanwhile, Miqaela got her scope set up and guiding pretty much without my help.  Woot! She borrowed my Orion ST-80 again.  However, her camera wasn't completely fastened into the eyepiece tube, so it slid out of focus a few times, and re-focusing at such a short focal length is difficult, since the stars always appear small and dim.  Between this and my attempts to piggyback, neither one of us started acquiring images until well after 11 PM.  Since it was a week night, my plan was to have us pack up around 12:30 AM, so that didn't leave us much time.

I managed to grab 14x7-minute subframes on the Western Veil Nebula, which I haven't imaged before.  The subs looked very promising, but the first iteration out of DeepSkyStacker came out very noisy, so I ditched the flats and tried again (I don't have an exact position marked on the scope, since I don't own it, so I just align the accessory shoe with the piggyback mount on top of the telescope tube, but it is inexact).  Maybe I can mark it with tape or something removable.  The stack without flats came out a little cleaner, but not much.  Trying out different debayering settings and stacking settings was still giving me very noisy images, although using "Auto Adaptive Weighted Average" in the "Lights" tab of the stacking parameters window seemed to do better, and I added the flats back in.
Date: 25 July 2017
Location: John Bryan State Park Observatory
Object: NGC 6960 Western Veil Nebula
Camera: Nikon D5300
Telescope: Vixen na140ssf
Accessories: Astronomik CLS filter
Mount: Losmandy Gemini II
Guide scope: Celestron 102mm
Guide camera: QHY5
Subframes: 13x420s (1h31m), ISO-1600
Darks: 10
Biases: 20
Flats: 20
Temperature: 58-60F 
See on AstroBin

Also, guiding was so good on the memorial scope that I may need to start dithering!  Dithering is where you can have PHD or your image capture program (through PHD) move the telescope a pixel or two every so many frames so that you don't end up with one of the camera's hot pixels on the same spot in every frame.  Usually periodic tracking error pretty much takes care of this for me (even when I guide it shows up still, just more slowly), but guiding was so tight that my images barely moved, if they moved at all!

While my images were going, I also ran around with my D3100 and nabbed some Milky Way images, as well as the  Big Dipper.  One of the Green Bank attendees pointed out the "Green Bank Telescope" asterism in Ursa Major, and I was hoping to make a picture to show that.  I'm still figuring out how to make constellation stars stand out, so I'll post it here when I finish it.

We did indeed pack up at 12:30 AM and I got to bed by 2:15 AM.  Thank goodness for cheap office coffee to help me get through the afternoon!

Miqaela's image came out lacking the red, but that's to be expected from an achromatic refractor, it looks like.  We didn't quite get the field-of-view moved up high enough to see the Pickering region in between the Eastern and Western Veil Nebulae, but you can kind of see some of it in the lower parts of both my and her images.  Still pretty neat what you can capture with a cheap refractor!  And she got some pretty neat star colors.
Western Veil Nebula, Nikon D5300, Orion ST-80
4x300s, ISO-1600

There was also a very nice ISS pass - almost straight overhead!  As well as an Iridium flare.  I misjudged where the flare was going to occur, so I only caught it in the side of the frame (and out of focus).
International Space Station, Nikon D3100, 18mm @ f/3.5, 30s, ISO-800

Iridium flare (on the right edge of the frame), Nikon D3100, 18mm @ f/3.5, 30s, ISO,400
(Now I know what some of those UFO pictures are.)

A short but productive evening!


Saturday, May 27, 2017

#88 - Saturday, May 27, 2017 - Texas Star Party Night 7

Since it was the last night of the Texas Star Party, I needed to pack up that evening so we could take off in the morning for the long drive back.  However, I decided to grab at least a little more data – you know I can’t resist.  The ISS was scheduled to make a twilight pass near the crescent Moon, so I went to SkySafari to figure out how far away, and then decided to use the 55-200mm lens on the D3200 piggybacked on the Borg.  I grabbed several frames as it moved across, and then also some nice ones of the earthshine as well.  I took some videos on the C11 too, but haven’t processed them.
Moon, Nikon D3200 piggybacked on Borg 76ED on the Celestron AVX mount
200mm @ f/5.6, 0.77s, ISO-800

I made a GIF of the ISS pass (and I think I've figured out how to control the frame rate now):
ISS passing by the moon, Nikon D3100, 165mm @ f/5.6
1/4s, ISO-800 (except for those two weirdly longer frames in the middle, which are 1/2s - not sure why that happened)

What a great trip!  I was glad to spend some time with Melody, and I got some absolutely incredible images.  I imaged 22 separate targets that week, we had clear nights nearly the entire week, I met some awesome people, and had a nice relaxing time out in the middle of West Texas.  I’m so glad I went!  And I’m definitely going to plan on going next year, this time with Miqaela!


Friday, May 26, 2017

#87 - Friday, May 26, 2017 - Texas Star Party Night 6

After the last talk of the day, astronaut Don Petit’s “Scientific Advances from What Appears to be Goofing Around in Space,” it was a rush to get set up as the sky cleared and darkened and the sunset winds died down.  Re-aligned, re-polar aligned, and started with face-on spiral galaxy M100.  Stuck to 6-minute subs for greater reliability (and the possibility of me having dark files to match), and it came out pretty decently!  Might go back and fix the coloring a bit.  Unfortunately, I discovered that my laptop’s screen is very de-saturated – colors do not look as intense as they do on other screens.  It’s an old laptop.  So I’ll have to be careful editing on it in the future not to over-saturate; I posted a bunch of pictures on Facebook that looked awful on my phone, haha.  
Date: 26 May 20176
Location: Prude Ranch, TX - Texas Star Party
Object: M100
Camera: Nikon D5300
Telescope: Celestron C11
Accessories: f/6.3 focal reducer
Mount: Celestron CGE Pro
Guide scope: Orion ST-80
Guide camera: QHY5
Subframes: 16x360s (1h36m), ISO-1600
Darks: 15
Biases: 20
Flats: 20
Temperature: 47-50F

It’s between constellations Virgo and Coma Berenices, both of which contain massive galaxy clusters.  This image contains five galaxies, according to AstroBin.  Four are easy to see; the fifth is a little white dot at about the 10 o’clock position, but not that star that’s right on the edge closer to 11 o’clock.  The cigar-shaped one on the lower left is NGC 4312.  It’s not quite edge-on, but it’s closer.  I swear I can see three more galaxies in the lower part of the frame that AstroBin didn’t label. 
            
While images were going, Melody and I went up to the upper field again, and this time we were in for a treat!  We hung around the 36” Dob and got to see a few things.  First we looked at Arp 330, a string of tiny dim galaxies.  I thought I could see a few of the six, but it was difficult.  Then, we got to see…M51!  This was going to be good.  It was nearly overhead, so the Dob was almost vertical, and the ladder was quite wobbly up that high.  I brought my face to the eyepiece, and gave a woop!  It was so incredible.  You could easily see the spiral structure, even the part that appears to connect M51 to the smaller galaxy NGC 5195.  It was so bright, and so amazing!  The owner of the big scope, I think his name was Larry, said he got the eyepiece that was in there specifically for looking at M51.  What a treat!
            
After we got back down to the lower field, I also looked at open cluster Cronenberger 13, open cluster Collinder 333, and open cluster Berkley 46, which I thought looks kind of like a hand, through Bob’s refractor. 
            
On the Borg, I started with the Rho Oph complex, with the D3200 piggybacked again.  I wanted more data on it.  Then when the Milky Way came up a little more, I zoomed out to 100mm and did a widefield shot that I wasn’t sure about at first, and it didn’t do well in DSS, but then I processed a single frame, and with some Photoshopping, it came out really nice.  It’s already got 18 likes on AstroBin, and two comments!  
Date: 26 May 2017
Location: Prude Ranch, TX - Texas Star Party
Object: Milky Way widefield
Camera: Nikon D3200 (Miqaela's), piggybacked on Borg 76ED
Telescope: 55-200mm lens at 100mm, f/5.6
Accessories: NA
Mount: Celestron AVX
Guide scope: N/A
Guide camera: N/A
Single frame, 150s, ISO-1600
See on AstroBin (including labels!!)
Buy on Zazzle

There’s a bunch of stuff in here according to AstroBin, but the highlights include M8 and M20 near the top of the frame; the Sagittarius Star Cloud on the left; and M4 in the lower portion, along with a whole bunch more globulars and other clusters well-known stars.  I’m quite pleased with it. 
            
I left the camera piggyback and rotated over to the Elephant Trunk nebula later that night, but I can’t really tell which of those dark lanes is supposed to be the elephant trunk part.  It’s still quite pretty, and includes the Garnet Star there on the left.
Date: 26 May 2017
Location: Prude Ranch, TX - Texas Star Party
Object: IC 1396 Elephant Trunk Nebula
Camera: Nikon D3200 (Miqaela's), piggybacked on Borg 76ED
Telescope: 55-200mm lens at 200mm
Accessories: NA
Mount: Celestron AVX
Guide scope: N/A
Guide camera: N/A
Subframes: 21x150s (52m30s), ISO-1600
Darks: 20 (fridge darks)
Biases: 18
Flats: 0
Temperature: 46F

Here’s a picture club member Will posted recently from inside his Newtonian (so a much smaller FOV) of the elephant trunk part.
Hmm.
            
Over on the C11, in the wee hours after getting a reasonable amount of data on M100, I decided I just had to image M51.  I was trying to not image the brighter stuff that I can image from home, but I couldn’t resist.  I snagged about 12x6-minute subs before the sun came up, and each sub looked better than my previous best M51, so I knew this was going to be good.  When I processed it later, my jaw hit the floor!
Date: 26 May 20176
Location: Prude Ranch, TX - Texas Star Party
Object: M51 Whirlpool Galaxy
Camera: Nikon D5300
Telescope: Celestron C11
Accessories: f/6.3 focal reducer
Mount: Celestron CGE Pro
Guide scope: Orion ST-80
Guide camera: QHY5
Subframes: 8x360s (48m), ISO-1600
Darks: 15
Biases: 20
Flats: 20
Temperature: 46F

HOLY COW!!  Simply incredible.  I couldn’t see any of that wispy gas around NGC 5195 in the subs, and the colors came out just perfect.  I am totally thrilled!  It’s a little on the noisy side, but the background came out nice.  So incredible.  I’m so excited!!  I’m so glad I decided to grab some data on that.
            
Also that night, I brought the D3100 and Melody’s ultrabook up to the upper field and set up a two-hour timelapse – that’s as long as my camera battery will last.  The vantage point I wanted was too far from an AC power source, although next year I’ll have to work something out because I really want an all-night timelapse up there.  I took 30-second frames to get a nice Milky Way, but this only got me 180 frames, unfortunately.  But it looks awesome in the TSP compilation video I made!  Here’s a single frame I processed.
Milky Way over the upper field at the Texas Star Party
Nikon D3100, 18mm @ f/3.5, 30s, ISO-3200

Beautiful!

And here's the compilation video I made (the upper field timelapse is at the end):