Showing posts with label Iridium Flare. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Iridium Flare. Show all posts

Monday, September 17, 2018

#161 - Saturday, September 15, 2018 - The Comet and the Supernova

Sometimes, going out to the observatory on a particular night is a bad idea.  And sometimes I do it anyway, despite my better judgment.  And sometimes it turns out to be a really good idea anyway!  On Saturday, I ran a 10k race early that morning, getting up at 5 AM.  The race started at 7:30 AM, and it was already in the lower 70s.  It stayed overcast during the race, but it was also muggy, so I was roasting hot by the end.  Despite my water-drinking efforts of the prior 24 hours, I still managed to become dehydrated, and I threw up in my friend's front yard, on her stairs, and then finally in her toilet.  Exhausted and sick, I made it home and took two 1-hour naps broken up by drinking water and eating some toast.

"Normal" people might have said, "Y'know, I probably shouldn't be out late tonight.  I should just go to bed."  But being normal is boring, so you bet your derriere I still went out to the observatory!

I was already still set up from Thursday night, so at least I didn't have to haul any gear around.  Just my DSLR, tripod, and bag with warm clothes, bug spray, and extra water and Gatorade.  I still had some hydrating to do.

I got out there around 8 PM, uncovered my Celestron AVX, Borg 76mm apochromatic refractor, and ZWO ASI1600MM Pro from underneath the TeleGizmos 365 cover I'd placed over the whole thing on Thursday night.  Once it got dark enough, I re-polar aligned (the setup is so lightweight, I was fairly certain that putting on and taking off the cover had moved it slightly) and then re-aligned.  However, while my western sky stars were showing up in the mount's initial guess easily, the eastern stars were not.  So I shut it off, re-polar aligned again, and then tried again.  The western stars were good, and the eastern ones were still a little ways off, and I had to use my finderscope to place them in the camera's FOV.  My target for the evening was continuing the Eastern Veil Nebula, NGC 6992.  I acquired the luminance frames on Thursday, so it was time for color frames.  I tried to use AstroTortilla to plate solve, but it was having trouble, so I gave up and tried to center the nebula myself.  I ended up a decent ways off of the luminance frames, unfortunately, although I still had the whole thing in the field.

Guiding was no better Saturday night than it was Thursday, unfortunately.  I tried guiding in just one direction again, and it helped a little, but not much, and then the dec axis took off and never came back.  As the night wore on, it just kept getting worse.  I did eventually re-focus the guide camera and re-calibrate guiding, but to no avail.

Finally, fellow club member John and I decided to pop open the dec casing to take a peak inside.  Sometimes, plastic shavings from the casing can get caught up in the gears.  We didn't see anything unusual though in the gears attached to the motor, but the worm gear was deeper inside the mount and would've required taking off a bunch of stuff to get to, so we ended up just putting it back together.  Further research is required.

In addition to that, I was having issues with my Hotech self-centering field flattener.  The 2-inch barrel at the end is just a little too fat to easily get into a 2-inch eyepiece holder, so I have to jam it into the one that screws into the Borg, and then take the Borg out of its ring clamps in order to screw the field flattener, filter wheel, and camera on as one piece because the filter wheel otherwise hits the dovetail bar and I can't actually screw it on.  Despite how hard it is to get into the eyepiece holder, it was still wiggling around, even though I had it tightened down.  Unfortunately, I didn't realize it was flopping around until much later in the evening.  

I'm starting to get suuuuuper frustrated with my gear.  I've put too much effort into this to be dealing with this crap!

Anyway, despite the problems, and the field flattener not flattening very well because it's too far from the camera with the filter wheel in between (I'm working on finding a male or female T-thread to 2-inch eyepiece holder so I can put it the correct distance from the camera), I managed to get at least a couple of color frames per channel that didn't have absolutely craptacular guiding.  I just reset the guide star about every 10 minutes, and was able to get some usable subframes.  

While processing the Veil Nebula on Sunday afternoon and seeing how bad my luminance frames really were, I decided to try something new to me - using my RGB frames together to create a synthetic luminance frame.  It's actually super easy, and the result was pretty good.

For this image, since I'm still practicing on better data with PixInsight, I used DeepSkyStacker to register and stack the RGB frames, and then I pulled each stacked R, G, and B frame into Photoshop and stretched and denoised them (using Deep Space Noise Reduction in Carboni's Tools).  I then combined them into one image (done by creating a new image, and copying and pasting each color image into the reg, green, and blue channels of the new image, respectively), and created a copy.  Next, I went to Image -> Mode -> Lab Color on the copy, clicked the Channels tab in Layers, and copied and pasted the Lightness channel into its down new document.  This is your synthetic luminance.  Then I copied that image on top of the RGB combined image, and set the blend mode as Luminosity, like I normally would for applying an L image.  Then I just went about processing from there, adjusting color balance and curves and saturation and the like.  (See this tutorial for a full walkthrough of my normal LRGB stacking and processing process with DeepSkyStacker and Photoshop).  It came out pretty well!  Plus I didn't have to worry about cropping out the big offset between my L image and the RGB images.  
Date: 15 September 2018
Object: NGC 6992 Eastern Veil Nebula
Camera: ZWO ASI1600MM Pro
Telescope: Borg 76ED
Accessories: Hotech SCA field flattener, Astronomik LRGB Type 2c 1.25" filters
Mount: Celestron AVX
Guide scope: Orion 50mm mini-guider
Guide camera: QHY5L-II 
Subframes: R: 8x180s (24m)
   G: 5x180s (15m)
   B: 6x180s (24m)
Gain/ISO: 139
Stacking program: 1: DeepSkyStacker
Stacking method (lights): Median kappa-sigma clipping (2,5)
Darks: 20
Biases: 20
Flats: 0
Temperature: -20C (chip), 66F (ambient)

Even though my Borg is an apo, which means it's supposed to not have chromatic aberration, I was getting some blue halos around the brighter stars.  They weren't nearly as pronounced as the ones I get on one of the club's telescopes, a Vixen 140mm neo-achromat refractor, and were easily correctable using Noel Carboni's Reduce Small/Large Blue Halos routines.  I also don't have any flat frames for this setup yet, since I have to pull out the drawtube on the Borg a little bit to reach focus, and it rotates freely, and I haven't really settled on the way I connect all the parts and pieces together to be able to draw reference marks so I can use the same flat frames every time.  So there's a bit of a glow in the middle.  But still, not bad for an hour's worth of data from a light-polluted location!  It's almost as good as the one I took of it on my DSLR from the Green Bank Star Quest last year, and that was doing 7-minute subframes from a very dark location!

The Eastern Veil Nebula is part of the larger Veil Nebula, or Cygnus Loop.  It's the remnant of a supernova that exploded 8,000 years ago, and now the nebula is 50 lightyears across!  It's approximately 1,470 lightyears away in the constellation Cygnus, the Swan, which is high overhead in the summer and early fall.  The original star was 20 times the mass of our sun.

By the time I got through all of the RGB frames, it was nearly 3 AM.  This was a lot later than I'd planned on staying out, but it's a lot easier to stay out late when you have friends there!  Fellow club member Bob was there as well, and my minion Miqaela, who had her Orion ST-80 on her Celestron AVX and was imaging the Heart Nebula and the Silver Dollar (Sculptor) Galaxy with her Nikon D5300.  John reminded us that Comet 21P/Giacobini-Zinner was rising by about that time, and I decided that I had to take this opportunity to catch it!  So I slewed over to its current location at the feet of Gemini, the Twins, just above star Propus.  Getting RGB images on a comet with a monochrome camera is not impossible, but is very difficult, especially with a manual filter wheel, so I decided just to take luminance monochrome images instead.  Because my guiding was so bad, I just took a bunch of 30-second frames, which were plenty to see this magnitude +7 comet.  In fact, I even aimed a pair of handheld binoculars that direction, and was just barely able to see its smudge!

Comets move with regard to the background stars, and move fairly quickly.  Thus, DeepSkyStacker has a few different comet stacking modes: align on the stars but streak the comet (standard stacking mode), align on the comet and streak the stars, or run registration and stacking twice and align both.  I did all three, but the align on the comet and the stars made for some really weird streaking artifacts in the background of the image, so I just went with the streaked stars, steady comet version.  Now, for added fun, DSS can't detect where the comet is located, so you have to do it yourself.  I had 50 frames, so I painstakingly selected the comet in every frame.  Luckily, it saves that information to the text file that contains the registration info for each frame, so you only have to do it once.  Using median kappa-sigma clipping made the stars get all weird and fuzzy and dim, but they looked much better when I used auto-adaptive weighted average as the stacking mode instead.
 Date: 15 September 2018
Object: Comet 21P/Giacobini-Zinner
Camera: ZWO ASI1600MM Pro
Telescope: Borg 76ED
Accessories: Astronomik L Type 2c 1.25" filter
Mount: Celestron AVX
Guide scope: Orion 50mm mini-guider
Guide camera: QHY5L-II
Subframes: 50x30s (25m)
Gain/ISO: 139
Stacking program: DeepSkyStacker
Stacking method (lights): Auto-adaptive weighted average
Darks: 20
Biases: 20
Flats: 0
Temperature: -20C (chip)

The gaps are a result of the many bad frames I had to delete.  I originally took 70.  Stupid mount and its tracking problems.

But anyways, you can see the tail!!  That is star Propus at the bottom.
Comet 21P was discovered by Michael Giacobini in December 1900 at the Nice Observatory in France, and Ernst Zinner observed its return 6.5 years later.  When I imaged it on Saturday night, it was 0.4 AU (astronomical units, or the Earth-Sun distance) from Earth, or 36.9 million miles.  

In addition to the above image, I also wanted to make a video.  To do that, I realized I could use PixInsight to apply the same processing to every image, and convert them all from FITS to JPEG after so I could make the video.  FITS is a special astronomy format that most everyday image editing programs don't support.

First, I needed to calibrate - subtract dark and bias frames to reduce noise.  I used the BathPreProcessing script for this, and saved out each file as a new image.  Next, I registered each frame to the frame the DeepSkyStacker gave the highest score to when I was processing the stacked image above so that the stars would be steady, and you could see the comet move through them without the jitter of the mount's crappy tracking.  Each of those aligned images were saved out.  Next, I imported one of the frames and applied a screen stretch using ScreenTransferFunction, and then applied that to HistogramTransformation to actually stretch the image.  I minimized that process and opened up a MultiScaleLinearTransform process to apply noise reduction (following the settings in the Light Vortex Astronomy tutorial I used recently on an Andromeda Galaxy image of mine), and then minimized that too.  After some Googling, I right-clicked on the background screen and clicked ImageContainer, and then opened all of my light frames in it.  I could only figure out how to apply one step at a time, so first I applied the HistogramTransformation process to stretch, and then re-imported all of the stretched images I saved out, and then applied the MultiScaleLinearTransform noise reduction.  Then I used the BatchFormatConversion script and converted all of the PixInsight-format images to 8-bit JPGs.  Finally, I used Time Lapse Movie Monkey to generate the video.  The slowest it would do was 10 frames per second, but that turned out to be fine.  So the video is only 5 seconds long (I need to make a repeating version next), but it's super cool!  
The video spans 33 minutes of real time.

Aaaaaaggghhhhhhh soooooo cooooooollllll!!!!!!!!

All the while I was imaging the Eastern Veil Nebula and Comet 21P, I had my DSLR on a tripod taking a series of 30s images facing north to make a star trails image.  They're super easy to create - I've got a tutorial in this post.  This is the longest one I think I've done, 5 hours and 20 minutes.  What you're seeing here is the rotation of the Earth on its axis that creates our day-night cycle.  The bright streak near the center of the vortex is Polaris, the North Star.  As you can see, it's not exactly on the North Celestial Pole, the center of that rotation, but it's quite close.  The pole is at the same altitude as your latitude, so if you live on the 40 N parallel, it will be 40 degrees above the horizon.  From the North Pole, it would be straight overhead.  From the equator, on the horizon.  In the southern hemisphere, they can see the South Celestial Pole, and use it for polar alignment instead.
Nikon D5300, 18-55mm lens at 18mm, f/3.5, ISO-800, 580x30s frames

There are several other interesting things going on here as well!  The long red streaks are airplanes.  The brightest one you can see made a few course corrections, hence the wobbliness.  The dome is lit up by red light from people arriving and leaving the observatory with their car lights on, and opening their cars to get stuff.  If you look closely a little ways above the dome, you can see a dimmer, shorter streak - this is a satellite.  In particular, it's an Iridium flare.  The Iridium constellation of communications satellites have orbits that cause them to glint the sun over to the darkened part of the Earth, and that glint lasts about two minutes as they move across the sky.  In this case, there are actually two streaks, since the aging satellites in that constellation are being replaced.  The second streak is the replacement.  I created another image with just the five frames that show the flare.

Satellites usually brighten and then darken as they move across the sky into the Earth's shadow, but Iridiums are far brighter, and for a shorter stretch of sky.  If you've ever looked up and happened to catch a bright light briefly appear in the sky and then fade out, it was probably an Iridium flare!  You can use the free cell phone app Heavens Above to track them.

I finally called it quits and packed up, and got home at 5 AM.  I realized that I had been awake for 24 hours!  (With the exception of the two hour-long naps I took that afternoon).  Whoopsie!  But I got such awesome images, it was totally worth it!



Monday, August 13, 2018

#153 - Saturday, August 11, 2018 - Failure Just Makes Room for Future Success

As with anything that is hard, sometimes you have fabulous successes, and sometimes you have crushing failures.  Saturday night was more of a temporary setback kind of failure night, but with a couple of success points to raise its overall level to decent.  I didn't get much of what I intended out of the night, but got a couple bonuses to make up for it!

Saturday night was Members Night for astronomy club members out at the observatory, and we had a delicious Italian-themed potluck, to which I brought my baked mac & cheesay.  It was a staple while I was in braces in 2016 and 2017, and I'd make it the night after I got an adjustment and it would tie me over for the next couple meals until I could eat solid foods again.  There was a shocking lack of dessert, so my heroic minion Miqaela ran out and got some delicious ice cream for us!

As the sky started to get darker, I got my gear set up - my Celestron 8-inch Schmidt-Cassegrain riding atop my Celestron Advanced VX mount, the Lumicon off-axis guider I'm testing, and my ZWO ASI1600MM Pro as my imaging camera and QHY5 red hockey puck as my guide camera.  I removed the Vixen dovetail bar I had on top of the C8 for the refractor I had previously used to guide it to save a little weight, and I was able to only put on one counterweight instead of two, woot!  Then I took my time carefully balancing, since I had some serious backlash in the declination axis last time I was out.  I wasn't quite able to balance it still however, so I had to get clever.  Fellow club member Jim had mentioned a counterweight attachment he had that slid onto the front end of the dovetail that holds the scope to the mount, which got me thinking - I had something like that attached to my Borg refractor.  I grabbed the ring I use to mount the Borg, which is attached to a Vixen dovetail clamp, and used some gaffers tape to secure a waterbottle to the inside of the ring.

An elegant counterweight from a more civilized age.

Bonus points, its position adjustable, so if guiding still looked bad, I could move it out or in to help balance better!

Since we still had a ways to go until it was dark enough for me to polar align, I took off the focal reducer I had on for balancing purposes and I imaged Saturn and Jupiter.  Well, first I went and looked through someone's scope to see if the seeing was good enough to image them - there was a high haze moving through, and I wasn't sure if it had entirely dissipated.

This is where I met my first challenge of the evening: I couldn't find the dang planet!  Sometimes, my finderscope gets nudged around inside the box (especially when my cat lays on the box at home), so I wasn't sure how accurately aligned it was.  Also, I wasn't in focus yet, so I was most likely looking for a big de-focused donut.  It still wasn't showing up in the camera, so I grabbed an eyepiece and put it in the guide camera port on the off-axis guider, focused the scope, and slewed around.  I found the nearby wide double star Zubenelgenubi, and I rotated my phone so that SkySafari's map lined up with their angle to each other, but I still didn't quite come across it!  Finally I took the camera off, put in my 40mm eyepiece, and found it straightaway.  Then I centered the planet, adjusted my finderscope, put the camera back on, and focused.  Finally!   It came out okay.
Date: 11 August 2018
Object: Jupiter
Camera: ZWO ASI1600MM Pro
Telescope: Celestron C8
Accessories: Astronomik LRGB Type 2c 1.25" filters
Mount: Celestron AVX
Frames: L: 1252/2001
    R: 995/2003
G: 732/2005
B: 665/2002
Exposure: L: 20 ms
  R: 50 ms
  G: 40 ms
  B: 70 ms
ISO/Gain: 139
Stacking program: RegiStax 6

Saturn was next, which was easier to find now that the finderscope was aligned and my camera was focused.  This one came out the best.
Date: 11 August 2018
Object: Saturn
Camera: ZWO ASI1600MM Pro
Telescope: Celeston C8
Accessories: Astronomik LRGB Type 2c 1.25" filters
Mount: Celeston AVX
Frames: L: 299/1505
    R: 304/1560
G: 148/1500
B: 632/2002
Exposure: L: 55 ms
  R: 150 ms
  G: 150 ms
  B: 150 ms
ISO/Gain: L,R,G: 139
  B: 200
Stacking program: RegiStax 6

Planetary image processing is really interesting.  You start out with a video where nearly every frame has some kind of atmospheric distortion in it.  Any single frame doesn't look that great.  Then you run it through RegiStax or AutoStakkert, and it ranks them by quality and aligns them all.  You make a cutoff on quality, and it averages them with a moving average.  The result is this very fuzzy thing.  But then you apply the voodoo magic that is wavelet deconvolution, and you get this spectacular, clear planet that seems impossible to have been taken through 300 miles of light-distorting, messy atmosphere.  
The luminance frames from this Saturn data collect.
And by "many," I mean hundreds to a few thousand.

Then it's just putting the LRGB channels together, fixing the color, brightness, and contrast a bit, and poof!  You've got an epic planetary image.  (See this post for a how-to).

Mars wasn't up yet, and I was antsy to get some deep-sky imaging done with this off-axis guider, so I polar aligned (which went smoothly), aligned (which also went smoothly, since the finderscope was now aligned), and then slewed to M16, the Eagle Nebula, which I had collected luminance frames for previously but needed color frames.  

Once I got it centered, I went over to PHD2 and got the guide camera up and running, but the only stars I had were a few elongated smudges.  Remember, I've got a Schmidt-Cassegrain, and even with the focal reducer/field flattener, the stars on the edge are not terribly point-like.  They were too dim for PHD to do much with - it kept losing them in the noise.  I did get one calibration to work, but the backlash was really bad in declination, and the calibration was a mess, so I discarded it and adjusted the homemade counterweight.  It was already at the end of the dovetail, though, so I tried to move the whole telescope forward while it was still pointing at M16.  Bad idea - the RA axis clutch slipped, invalidating my mount's alignment model.  So I slewed to home, slid the telescope forward some more, and then re-aligned.

I gave up on M16 after that and went over to M27, the Dumbbell Nebula, since M16 was pretty far west at this point and in the heavy skyglow of light pollution.  M27 was nice and high, away from the haze and light, and it's bright enough that I could take shorter frames if needed.  But I couldn't find a bright-enough star there either, even when I moved the target around to try and bring a brighter star into the field-of-view of the guidescope.  On the bright side, though, I was showing our experienced astrophotographer how I couldn't get the plate-solving program AstroTortilla to work with my ZWO camera (it will move your telescope to get your object centered for you based on the positions of bright stars in the image, and I had gotten it to work on my DSLR at the Texas Star Party, but not the ZWO), and it magically worked!  Small victory.  That will be very helpful for meridian flips.

After I couldn't get any good guide stars, I decided to give up on the 8-inch until I got a more sensitive guide camera (which, thankfully, are rather cheap, astronomically speaking), and switch to my Borg refractor, which I'd also brought with me.  I'd already taken off the 8-inch and opened up the Borg's case when I realized that that wasn't going to work - I'd lent my minion Miqaela the field flattener that that telescope desperately needs.  She was borrowing an Explore Scientific apochromatic refractor from a fellow club member, and it also really needed that field flattener.

I decided instead to perform another experiment: Periodic Error Correction, or PEC, is a routine I hadn't tried yet on any of my mounts.  Basically, you record the tracking errors in the RA gear as it rotates around, and then play them back, which un-does them enough to be a suitable replacement for guiding in some cases, if your polar alignment and balance are good enough.  On the AVX mount, you only have to record it once, and it stores it in memory.  However, you needed to use your guide camera for it, and plug an ST-4 cable directly into the mount.  I'd never done this before, and I didn't have the ST-4 cable with me.  Luckily, the club's memorial telescope setup had one, and they're the same across all manufacturers, so I was able to borrow it.  I used the USB cable on my QHY5 to center nearby star Sham and focus the camera, and then the mount did PEC all on its own.  It took about 10 minutes to complete, since that's the time it takes to make one revolution.  When it was done, I turned it on, and took some 2-minute test frames.  The stars came out looking pretty fuzzy.  So I turned it off, and then I just had streaky stars.  So I dropped the exposure time to 30 seconds and just did unguided, un-PEC'd exposures.  I lose several to periodic tracking error, but you can take a lot when they're only 30 seconds long.  Thank goodness this camera is so sensitive.

30-second raw exposure, gain 139, on my ZWO ASI1600MM Pro of M27 Dumbbell Nebula.


About 80 luminance exposures in, I realized that the cooler wasn't running.  😒  That's when I finally gave up!!

At this point, it was about 2:30 AM, but the sky was gorgeous, my DSLR was clicking away on a tripod capturing Perseids, and I wasn't tired yet.  There was only a few of us left at the observatory to watch the Perseids - Miqaela, Bob and I.  But Miqaela was still taking images on the Heart Nebula, and several of the planets were up, so I took the focal reducer off again and decided to grab some planetary images, and then go home to bed.

Mars was first on my list.  I accidentally forgot to switch back to SER LuCam videos from the FITS format I use for my still frames, and because of that, the final images turned out rather dark.  I had to brighten them in RegiStax, which also brightened the background, which gave a weird effect when I re-darked the background.  However, you can see some hints of terrain features.  And an icecap that came out pinkish.

Date: 11 August 2018
Object: Mars
Camera: ZWO ASI1600MM Pro
Telescope: Celestron C8
Accessories: Astronomik LRGB Type 2c 1.25" filters
Mount: Celestron AVX
Frames: L: 594/2005
    R: 924/2002
G: 350/2001
B: 394/2003
Exposure: L: 0.1 ms
  R: 3 ms
  G: 3 ms
  B: 10 ms
ISO/Gain: 0
Stacking program: RegiStax 6

Mars was so stinking bright that not only did I have to use very short exposure times, I had to turn the gain down to 0 just to use those exposure times!  I guess I could have gone shorter - the ZWO ASI1600MM Pro will do as short as 32 microseconds, or 0.032 ms - but lower gain means more dynamic range anyway.  Of course, the short exposure times gives me the secondary benefit of ultra-fast frame rates - over 100 fps!  That means more frames in the good moments of atmosphere.

I tried for Uranus and Neptune too, but didn't get much.  I've seen them both in that telescope with eyepieces, and they definitely have color and are disc-like as opposed to pointlike, meaning you can definitely tell they are planets rather than stars.  But I couldn't really get the exposure time quite right, and they still came out saturated, although it didn't look like it in the histogram.  They were also really small, so I might try using a Barlow next time, and maybe use my smaller-chip QHY5.

In addition to all of the imaging I had planned for the night, it was also the Perseids meteor shower!  So I sat back and looked up whenever I was waiting for something to happen.  I saw about 5 total, while my fellow club members combined spotted about 25 over the course of the night.  I had my DSLR set up on a tripod facing northeast toward Perseus, and I managed to capture 7, but only two were bright enough and fully contained in the image.  You can see the color change, it's really cool!  I had 15-second frames at ISO-1600 set to run on the internal timer all night.
This one almost points to the Andromeda galaxy.

The meteor is on the upper left, while an airplane is on the upper right.

On top of that, there were three Iridium flares, which all happened to be in the same area of the sky as I had my camera facing!  This phenomenon comes from the Iridium constellation of communications satellites, which reflect light from the sun strongly back at Earth periodically during their orbits.  There are dozens of them in orbit, so many nights out of the year, you can see one.  They only last about a minute, but they start out very dim, and then get very bright - brighter than the stars, usually - and then fade back out.  An app like Heavens Above can tell you when the next one is, and SkySafari will alert you as well. 
A really bright one!  The gap is a result of the 2-second gap between successive frames on my camera.

A dimmer one in nearly the same place, only a few minutes later - probably a replacement for that particular satellite.  Also, my camera lens started to fog up before I moved the hand warmer I use as a dew heater closer to the front.

This one was really low, so neither Heavens Above nor SkySafari warned us.  I just happened to see it when I was scrolling through my images. 

I used the same software I use to make star trails, simply called Startrails, to stitch the successive images together.

At 3:10 AM, just after my last dataset on Uranus but before I started packing up, I remembered that the Parker Solar Probe re-scheduled launch was set for 3-something that morning, so I found a NASA stream online and turned the volume up.  Bob, Miqaela and I watched the awesome sight of a United Launch Alliance Delta-IV lift off from Cape Canaveral and deliver the vehicle up into space.  I'm not sure it will ever get old, even when spaceflight becomes routine.  I also always marvel when an airplane takes off and lands, even though I've flown more times than I can remember.  What a feat of human ingenuity.  The Parker Solar Probe will skim the surface of the sun to study the solar corona and solar wind.  An interviewee on the NASA live stream compared the distance to a football field; if the sun were at one end, and the Earth at the other, the Parker probe will be at the sun's 4-yard line, seven times closer than any spacecraft has gone before.  One of the questions it will strive to answer is why the corona, which is the sun's tenuous outer atmosphere, is over 1 million degrees Kelvin, even though its surface is only 5700 Kelvin.  It will swing between Venus and the sun seven times, and orbit the sun 24 times, getting closer each time.  The first perihelion (closest solar approach) will be this November, so pretty soon.  The 24th won't be until 2025.  So many years of solar exploration!  

So Saturday night was a mixed bag, but hopefully a more sensitive guide camera will help.  Off-axis guiding will make a lightweight setup with my 8-inch possible, which is a huge capability expansion, since I won't have to use my massive CGE Pro and 11-inch SCT to do narrow field-of-view imaging of small galaxies and planetary nebulae.  Then I just have to get the balance right to reduce the backlash in declination.  Here goes!


Wednesday, July 26, 2017

#99 - Tuesday, July 25, 2017 - I'm gonna need more coffee

It's a weeknight, Miqaela has "the bug," and of course I can never resist a clear night!  So I picked her up and we got out to the observatory at about 9:30 PM.  I decided to give piggyback imaging a try at the observatory - I figured the light pollution would be too much for short focal lengths, but I thought I'd try at least.  I mounted my D5300 atop the Vixen scope in the memorial dome, and attached a 70-300mm lens to it (also given to me by a club member last year).  At first, I couldn't see Deneb in the live view so I could focus (I had the focal length at ~200mm to try and capture the whole Veil Nebula), but the camera was up too high and was too far forward on the scope for me to use the viewfinder, so I ran inside and grabbed a step stool.  I saw where it was in the viewfinder, and then at last I was able to find it in the live view on my computer as a tiny dim spec.  I focused as best as I could, and then moved over the short distance to the Veil Nebula and took some 3-minute subframes.  They were pretty bright with light pollution, and I couldn't see the nebula at all.  So I scrapped that plan and plugged the D5300 into the Vixen and got guiding set up quickly.

Meanwhile, Miqaela got her scope set up and guiding pretty much without my help.  Woot! She borrowed my Orion ST-80 again.  However, her camera wasn't completely fastened into the eyepiece tube, so it slid out of focus a few times, and re-focusing at such a short focal length is difficult, since the stars always appear small and dim.  Between this and my attempts to piggyback, neither one of us started acquiring images until well after 11 PM.  Since it was a week night, my plan was to have us pack up around 12:30 AM, so that didn't leave us much time.

I managed to grab 14x7-minute subframes on the Western Veil Nebula, which I haven't imaged before.  The subs looked very promising, but the first iteration out of DeepSkyStacker came out very noisy, so I ditched the flats and tried again (I don't have an exact position marked on the scope, since I don't own it, so I just align the accessory shoe with the piggyback mount on top of the telescope tube, but it is inexact).  Maybe I can mark it with tape or something removable.  The stack without flats came out a little cleaner, but not much.  Trying out different debayering settings and stacking settings was still giving me very noisy images, although using "Auto Adaptive Weighted Average" in the "Lights" tab of the stacking parameters window seemed to do better, and I added the flats back in.
Date: 25 July 2017
Location: John Bryan State Park Observatory
Object: NGC 6960 Western Veil Nebula
Camera: Nikon D5300
Telescope: Vixen na140ssf
Accessories: Astronomik CLS filter
Mount: Losmandy Gemini II
Guide scope: Celestron 102mm
Guide camera: QHY5
Subframes: 13x420s (1h31m), ISO-1600
Darks: 10
Biases: 20
Flats: 20
Temperature: 58-60F 
See on AstroBin

Also, guiding was so good on the memorial scope that I may need to start dithering!  Dithering is where you can have PHD or your image capture program (through PHD) move the telescope a pixel or two every so many frames so that you don't end up with one of the camera's hot pixels on the same spot in every frame.  Usually periodic tracking error pretty much takes care of this for me (even when I guide it shows up still, just more slowly), but guiding was so tight that my images barely moved, if they moved at all!

While my images were going, I also ran around with my D3100 and nabbed some Milky Way images, as well as the  Big Dipper.  One of the Green Bank attendees pointed out the "Green Bank Telescope" asterism in Ursa Major, and I was hoping to make a picture to show that.  I'm still figuring out how to make constellation stars stand out, so I'll post it here when I finish it.

We did indeed pack up at 12:30 AM and I got to bed by 2:15 AM.  Thank goodness for cheap office coffee to help me get through the afternoon!

Miqaela's image came out lacking the red, but that's to be expected from an achromatic refractor, it looks like.  We didn't quite get the field-of-view moved up high enough to see the Pickering region in between the Eastern and Western Veil Nebulae, but you can kind of see some of it in the lower parts of both my and her images.  Still pretty neat what you can capture with a cheap refractor!  And she got some pretty neat star colors.
Western Veil Nebula, Nikon D5300, Orion ST-80
4x300s, ISO-1600

There was also a very nice ISS pass - almost straight overhead!  As well as an Iridium flare.  I misjudged where the flare was going to occur, so I only caught it in the side of the frame (and out of focus).
International Space Station, Nikon D3100, 18mm @ f/3.5, 30s, ISO-800

Iridium flare (on the right edge of the frame), Nikon D3100, 18mm @ f/3.5, 30s, ISO,400
(Now I know what some of those UFO pictures are.)

A short but productive evening!